A MESSAGE FROM ANONYMOUS – #OpBANKERBLACKFAX #OccupyWallStreet #OWS

Vodpod videos no longer available.

A MESSAGE FROM ANONYMOUS – #OpBANKERBLACKFAX #…, posted with vodpod

Advertisements

Garbage – Push It – TPM Was Not DDoSed By Anonymous

Vodpod videos no longer available.

Garbage – Push It, posted with vodpod

So who is pushing garbage on the internet? Is it the groups that are fighting for freedom, truth and full disclosure?  Those that want to promote open science, media and dialogue?  Or those with singular ideas that want to make sure you all agree with them, while they stuff money down their pants?  If you aren’t profiting from the undertaking by expressing on idea, then I am clearly more likely to listen.

With that thought in mind, I was thinking about the recent Talking Points Memo (@TPM) DDoS attack which could have been pulled off by any malicious group with a high school education.  Then I began to think about the thousands of left wings followers (and the thousands of far right wing followers) of the six major Anonymous groups.  What would be in it for Anonymous to attack TPM on the eve of one of biggest world wide protests ever seen? Nothing.

Then I continued the thought.  Who would be best able to mount such a false flag attack on TPM? Who could benefit from discrediting them at this time? I will leave for you to figure out—

I continued the thought.  The six major groups all hash out their plans, vote and always announce them in advance and take credit for the attack afterward.  This has not been done in this case. Why? I will again leave for you to figure out—

The various groups do have a number of principles they follow and it just seems to me that to target TPM for this article would be antithetical to those principles.  And just plain foolish to only target them. Check them out here and affiliates here and here and here and here  and here.  I suppose splinter groups are always possible, but then are they Anonymous?

Now for the oglers that want to see the pictures of innocent people that were momentarily NOT available on TPM you can look here and here and here and here. To just name a few in a brief search. So were they just saying, this is your fault TPM and we are going to risk 15 years in jail to momentarily disrupt information that we can no longer stop being disseminated across the internet? They would do this even though TPM is just doing what what Anonymous risks their freedom to achieve, namely freedom of information? I can’t believe this to be true.

The TPM photos were not available here oddly for the longest (but not as long as I thought). Oddly because that would make it a record for a DDoS sustained attack. Damn near tantric!  On further review I found out  the longest such attack was as long as 60 days!  This brings on reverse of my original thought. If it was really meant to do harm, then why not do it for longer? I still don’t buy that it TPM would be sole target even if they were the origin of all the information proliferation on the internet, and I think the editor will end up apologizing for even suggesting it was a logical implication that it was Anonymous that did it.  By the way, why would they take down the group pictures and not this one? Note who are the historical victims of Anonymous as reported by TPM here.

Don’t mind me. I am just gullible.

Update:

OK, I got some comments that Anonymous was not an organization as seen in Gawker.  I clearly disagree.  The left also, professional or otherwise, is not considered an organization either, because in the aggregate we too have no leader, but thought. No wealth, but creativity. And no agenda, but truth. So would someone say those left or right of center are just a loose collection of [insert noun here]?  Since those not in center often see the center as a sheep pen, I suppose the obverse is true as well. All the sheep see are wolves circling.

To be more formal in the organization argument consider a complex distributive network like the heart. A few cells will beat on their own. When hooked to a larger series of networks a simple signal can keep the whole in working order.  Would anyone deny the heart is an organization? I think free societies only work as such when they are modeled on complex distributive networks.

Hello Wall Street – We Are Anonymous #OccupyWallStreet #SEP17 #MarchOnWashington #OCT06

Vodpod videos no longer available.

Hello Wall Street – We Are Anonymous, posted with vodpod

Anonymous to the Machine: You Will Rust and die from the blood of our hearts!

Vodpod videos no longer available.

Anonymous to the Machine: You Will Rust and die…, posted with vodpod

A99 Empire State Rebellion – An Idea Whose Time Has Come  #OpESR #SEP17 #OccupyWallStreet #AntiBanks

Vodpod videos no longer available.

A99 Empire State Rebellion_ An Idea Whose Time …, posted with vodpod

Vodpod videos no longer available.

Anonymous 99 Video – Fight Back Against Corpora…, posted with vodpod

Atari Teenage Riot – Black Flags #OccupyWallStreet #SEP17 Are You Ready To Testify?

Vodpod videos no longer available.

Atari Teenage Riot – Black Flags #OccupyWallStr…, posted with vodpod

Black Flags (feat. Boots Riley)

Atari Teenage Riot
Anonymous Teenage Riot

Are you ready to testify ? 

Are you ready to testify?

Black Flags

Are you ready to testify?

You got 2 seconds

Are you ready to testify!!! Come on!

There’s a unified axis of government
And corporate power
Lawless and unrestrained
That’s what we should talk about
Corporations exploit the power of the state
To further enhance their power
And the real criminals get away

Are you ready to testify ?
Are you ready to testify?
Black Flags
Are you ready to testify?
You got 2 seconds
Are you ready to testify!!! Come on!

Try to threat the system
You’ll have the full weight of law
Come crashing down upon you
So you don’t resist
Surveillance, goons
Force us to be silent
They kill the careers of journalists
So noone can resist

my flow, it sputters like they shut off my water
i got the sheriff after me for what i said bout obama
my flag is red like a period
comma
i’m a piranha
just like every one of y’all
let’s take that shark to the slaughter
and here we gotta beat bouncin’ more than last months rent check
the boss walkin’ walll street with a pimp step
people of whoville!
we need to slit the grinch’s neck
we low paid prostitutes with no fishnets
ash-sha`b yurid isqat an-nizam
tell homeland security we are the bomb
inform the house staff the mob’s on the lawn
and it aint no soiree
il ne c’est pas bon
they call this black flags
but i’m not an anarchist
i’m on some sickle/hammer shit
collective bruce banner shit
over a piano pitch
cock and let the hammer hit
we’re here collecting damages
and handing knuckle sandwiches

There’s a class war going on
And it’s the rich who are waging it!
They try to destroy anyone who is a threat to their power
Playing for keeps – they want it all!

Do you want it all?

Are you ready to testify ?
Are you ready to testify?
Black Flags
Are you ready to testify?
You got 2 seconds
Are you ready to testify!!! Come on!

Wikileaks Anthem – Protest Song by Isaac Sloan #MarchOnWashington #OCT06 #OccupyWallStreet #SEP17

Wikileaks Anthem – Protest Song by Isaac Sloan #MarchOnWashington #OCT06 #OccupyWallStreet #SEP17
Vodpod videos no longer available.

1st collector for Wikileaks Anthem – Protest Song by Isaac Sloan …
Follow my videos on vodpod

2011 Starts With Protests Worldwide. Will You Join Them? #MarchOnWashington #Oct06 #OccupyWallStreet #SEP17 #Antibanks

Vodpod videos no longer available.

2011 starts with protests worldwide, posted with vodpod

Do Public Employees Have The Right Not To Piss In Public? #union

When you consider the information that should be public for public employees, you need to ask a few reasonable questions.

…

What is it that can legally be made public?

…

And what information must be protected?

…

Those should be the first two questions.   The answers will vary from place to place, but how you answer them may determine the solvency of our government itself. Clearly we don’t want released any personal information on these non-elected employees that is not related to their public function.

…

So the next question is what is personal information?

…

I will leave it to you to decide, but consider the consequences of your answer. Can you imagine what danger we put the public employee in by releasing personal information if we are asking public employees to deal with potentially dangerous individuals and demanding they deny them services?  The class action suit by such a release could cripple the country, especially if some irate individuals start going after public employees they have a grudge against. The necessary information can be obtained by filing a freedom of information act (FOIA) request, but does that mean that information can be freely be published on the internet in total?  It is being so released in many areas, particularly areas with Republican administrations.  This information is being published unchallenged in many cases.

…

What does someone’s full name, gender, race, town of residence and zip code have to do with their function as a public employee? How about how much sick time they use or their personal 401k contribution?

…

A sociopathic parolee denied services somewhere like the board of elections, the department of motor vehicles, or social services are just as likely to find those employees on the internet and go after them as their arresting officer, the judge, the parole officer or the district attorney. My understanding is that some district attorney’s offices can and have blocked their information from being published.  How are they a protected class and how are they any more in danger than any other public employee?

..

On top of all that, I have found less information on many elected officials (whose information is supposed to be the less private) than their employees across the country.

…

This cannot go unchallenged.  It is the Republicans (with the exception of Ron Paul, a libertarian)  that so strongly object to the Anonymous or Wikileaks release of private information (although the Democrats have condemned the release of what they consider state secrets).  But these same Republican representatives do not appear to be so concerned about the same information being released on their employees. The fact that a public employee’s salary is public already and can be found at any public library (or over the phone) without a FOIA request is telling.

…

This pertinent fact suggests we are dealing with harassment, not transparent disclosure.

…

The fact that you can look up and see how much  earned sick time and vacation time each public employee has used in some areas is not related to their public function.  You can see how much time they are allowed from the same public library (or on the internet) along with their current and historical salary.  To publish 25% of the population’s information on the internet is clearly harassment and not furthering any specific state interest.

…

It is part of a union busting process and, as such, must be stopped.

…

Public employees do not give up their constitutional rights at the door.  They do not work for you personally.  To think they do is to abrogate the whole of the progressive civil service movement whose legislative intent a hundred years ago was to keep politics out of non-elected public service, and it is a matter of established law.  For Republicans to tout the rule of law is a myth in this area as it is in most others.

…

Many public employees are paid out of local general funds and you do not have any reason or standing to see any information on the county clerk’s secretary in Bakersfield unless you happen live in Kern county.  The idea that I can look it up and see an employee’s personal 401k information that they pay for themselves is unconscionable. What right do I have to know that the program coordinator of the HR department of University of Arizona has not gotten a raise in three years and is grossly underpaid? The publication of this information on the internet is an arbitrary and capricious  release of information to people that have no business knowing it. That we have so many lawyers in this country and so few have successfully brought a challenge to these unconstitutional practices is mind boggling to me.

…

You may might think that this must have passed the muster of the local government attorneys that reviewed it, but those attorneys are not civil service attorneys, they are appointed by the local elected administration and their jobs depend on their decisions.  This is the very reason for civil service itself and is being worked around. I challenge all of you to start looking for the personal information released on public employees around the country and write, email and call your local legislatures telling them what you think about the release of such personal information. How is that release any different than let us say, all corporate employee information for corporations that receive any government funds? That will be next. In many areas that may involve more taxpayer dollars than the government employees. Also consider the pension information that is released.  These people are no longer public employees, and most of them, around the country, contributed from their paychecks for that pension.  What right does the general public have to that information?  What state interest is served by its release?

 …

If you are still not moved by my arguments, then consider it the next time you call the police or fire department, get a call from the school, want your road plowed, ask for an increase in your child support, have to call child welfare, need to apply for some public benefit or just want to live in a civil society.  I assure you, your decision to allow the disclosure of private information could influence all public employees’ decisions.   Every public employee in the nation will have to consider whether his life is put in jeopardy by the decision that he should make,  even though it is his job to not consider it, by law.  That is what you risk changing by insisting on such disclosure.

…

In sum, every public emplyee is required by law to give every citizen the right of due process and equitable treatment.  The very thing you are denying to that employee.

…

I continue to look:

…

To continue the argument consider that NJ releases information to the press to maintain a public database on USPS workers salary and positions, yet taxpayers have not funded the USPS since the 1980s. What public interest is being served by this release of private information? Even when you feel as a taxpayer it is your right to know the salary and benefits of those public employees in your area, does everyone everywhere have a right to know it? For example, school boards and budgets are locally voted on and debated in a public venue.  What public interest does publication of individual information outside of the that school district serve?  Clearly this is done to incite rather than inform.

Anonymous to the Machine: You Will Rust and die from the blood of our hearts!

Vodpod videos no longer available.

Anonymous to the Machine: You Will Rust and die…, posted with vodpod